Developing

Implementing Gnu GPLv3 License

Overview
More Articles About 
Developing
Implementing Apache 2.0 License
Published
December 19, 2025

LICENSE file

  1. Create LICENSE with GPLv3 text
  • Copy the entire GNU GPL v3 text into a file named LICENSE at the repo root.
  • Get it from: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt (unchanged text).
  • At the top or bottom, add your copyright line, e.g.:

SPDX Headers

Add SPDX headers to source files (recommended)

  • JavaScript/TypeScript:
  • CSS:
  • HTML:

README.md

  1. Add a short notice in README.md
This project is licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0 (GPL-3.0).
See the LICENSE file for details.

COPYING file ( optional )

(Optional) Add a COPYING pointer file

See the LICENSE file for the full GPL-3.0 license text.

Github commit & push

  1. Commit before making the repo public
git add LICENSE README.md COPYING
git add -A                         # if you added SPDX headers
git commit -m "Add GPL-3.0 license"
git push

  1. Verify on GitHub
  • Private repo → Settings → General → "Danger Zone" → make public.
  • GitHub should detect "GPL-3.0" automatically from LICENSE.

Notes

  • Keep the GPL text unaltered. Only add your copyright line.
  • If you include third-party code, ensure it's GPL-compatible.
  • If you need a permissive exception (e.g., linking exception), state it clearly in README.md and reference it from the top of LICENSE (this changes the licensing--only do if intended).

FAQs

how does github know the rules for forking, or are those unenforced. Does anything need to be added to package.json

ChatGPT said:

GitHub does not technically enforce licensing rules such as fork permissions or derivative obligations. It simply uses the license text in your repo to inform users of their legal rights and responsibilities. Compliance is up to the users -- and ultimately enforceable only via legal means if violated.

Here's how it works in practice:


✅ How GitHub handles GPL licensing and forking

ActionWhat GitHub doesWhat GPL legally requiresIs it enforced by GitHub?
Forking repoAlways allowed if publicGPL allows copying✅ GitHub enables forking by default
Publishing modificationsUp to the userGPL requires making modified source available under same license❌ GitHub won't enforce
Commercial useAllowed by GPLGPL permits commercial distribution under GPL❌ GitHub doesn't track
Not complying with GPL termsNothing happens automaticallyLegally a violation❌ Maintainer must enforce outside GitHub

📌 Key point:

GitHub only indicates the license (for visibility and documentation) - it does not enforce compliance. Forks and copies are technically allowed because GPL explicitly allows redistribution.

package.json

📦 Does anything need to go in package.json?

✅ Recommended: Add a "license" field so that tools like npm clearly display the license. Example:

{
  "license": "GPL-3.0-only"
}

OR, if you want to allow future GPL version updates:

{
  "license": "GPL-3.0-or-later"
}

🚫 No additional GPL rules need to be encoded into package.json -- the LICENSE file governs it legally.


📜 Optional metadata for SPDX and clarity

You may also add a LICENSE reference in your README.md (good practice), but nothing else is technically required to make it enforceable.

Automatic Detect

Github


🔍 How GitHub identifies and displays licenses

  • It detects the license by scanning the LICENSE file (using the SPDX standard).
  • If correctly recognized, GitHub will display a "GPL-3.0" badge.
  • It does not enforce terms (like copyleft) -- that is up to you if someone violates it.

✅ Summary

QuestionAnswer
Does GitHub enforce GPL conditions (e.g., making modifications open-source)?❌ No, it's legal, not technical enforcement.
Do I need anything else for the fork rules to "activate"?❌ No; GPL text itself defines the rules.
Do I need to modify package.json?✅ Add "license": "GPL-3.0-only" (recommended).
Do I need extra enforcement controls on GitHub?❌ No -- licensing is advisory/documented unless violated legally.

Would you like a ready-to-paste package.json license addition or SPDX headers batch helper next?

You said:

what about the link back to the repo from npm, or in the package.json

ChatGPT said:

GitHub-npm linking works through metadata fields in package.json.

None of these affect GPL licensing -- they just help users trace your package back to its source.


✅ Recommended fields in package.json

Here's what you should include for a GitHub-hosted open-source project:

{
  "name": "your-package-name",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "description": "Short summary of your package.",
  "repository": {
    "type": "git",
    "url": "git+https://github.com/yourusername/your-repo.git"
  },
  "bugs": {
    "url": "https://github.com/yourusername/your-repo/issues"
  },
  "homepage": "https://github.com/yourusername/your-repo#readme",
  "license": "GPL-3.0-only"
}


📌 Field meanings

FieldPurpose
"repository"Tells npm (and users) where the source code lives. Appears as a "Repository" link on npmjs.com.
"bugs"Lets users report issues. Appears as "Bugs" link on npm.
"homepage"Points to documentation or the repo's README.
"license"SPDX identifier for the package's license.

NPM

For NPM packages;

🧭 Notes

  • Always use the git+https form for the repo URL; npm parses it properly.
  • The #readme anchor on the homepage ensures npm shows your GitHub README as documentation.
  • GitHub and npm will automatically cross-link your package and repo when these fields are correct.

✅ Example result on npmjs.com

When published, your npm page will show:

  • "Repository: GitHub → yourusername/your-repo"
  • "Homepage: link to README"
  • "Bugs: link to Issues"
  • "License: GPL-3.0"
Table of Contents
Comments
Did we just make your life better?
Passion drives our long hours and late nights supporting the Webflow community. Click the button to show your love.